The One World Company

[tony human]

The One World CompanyDaniel Estulin, noted expert on the Bilderberger’s, describes that secretive globalist group as "a medium of bringing together financial institutions which are the world's most powerful and most predatory financial interests." Writing in June 2011, he said: “Bilderberg isn't a secret society....  It's a meeting of people who represent a certain ideology....  Not OWG [One World Government] or World Government as too many people mistakenly believe. Rather, the ideology is of a One World Company Limited.”

 

It seems the Bilderberger’s are less interested in governing the world than in owning the world. The "world company" was a term first used at a Bilderberger meeting in Canada in 1968 by George Ball, US undersecretary of state for economic affairs and a managing director of banking giants Lehman Brothers and Kuhn Loeb. The world company was [is] to be a new form of colonialism, in which global assets would be acquired by economic rather than military coercion. The company would extend across national boundaries, aggressively engaging in mergers and acquisitions until the assets of the world were subsumed under one privately owned corporation, with nation-states subservient to a private international central banking system.

 

Estulin continues: “The idea behind each and every Bilderberg meeting is to create what they themselves call The Aristocracy of Purpose between European and North American elites on the best way to manage the planet. In other words, the creation of a global network of giant cartels, more powerful than any nation on Earth, destined to control the necessities of life of the rest of humanity.”

This explains what George Ball said back in 1968, at a Bilderberg meeting in Canada: "Where does one find a legitimate base for the power of corporate management to make decisions that can profoundly affect the economic life of nations to whose governments they have only limited responsibility?" That base of power was found in the private, global banking system.

 

Estulin goes on: “The problem with today's system is that the world is run by monetary systems, not by national credit systems. You don't want a monetary system to run the world. You want sovereign nation-states to have their own credit systems, which is the system of their currency. The possibility of productive, non-inflationary credit creation by the state, which is firmly stated in the US Constitution, was excluded by the Maastricht Treaty (the Treaty of the European Union) as a method of determining economic and financial policy.”

The world company acquires assets by preventing governments from issuing their own currencies and credit. Money is created instead by banks as loans at interest. The debts inexorably grow, since more money is always owed back than was created in the original loans. If currencies are not allowed to expand to meet increased costs and growth, the inevitable result is a wave of bankruptcies, foreclosures and sales of assets at fire sale prices. Sales of assets to whom? To the "World Company."